Crucible · Seed-to-Harvest Index v2026.2

Seed-to-Harvest Index

Federal SBIR programs seed small-business R&D, but the follow-on contract dollars those firms later win do not always come back to the agency that paid for the seed. The Seed-to-Harvest Index measures, for each of seven SBIR programs, the share of matched follow-on prime-contract dollars that the sponsoring agency retains. It is computed from SBIR.gov award data joined to USAspending prime contracts; see the methodology for how the join works and what it cannot see.

Retention ranking

ProgramRetention shareSBIR seed $Follow-on $ backFollow-on $ elsewhereFirms retained
DARPA 81.3%
$2.5B $52.5B $12.1B 1,101 explore
DoD 76.2%
$35.3B $158.3B $49.6B 6,249 explore
HHS 15.3%
$21.1B $17.1B $94.7B 1,161 explore
NASA 10.2%
$4.7B $7.7B $68.0B 1,538 explore
DHS 6.2%
$357M $1.1B $16.0B 241 explore
DOE 1.0%
$5.5B $320M $32.6B 71 explore
NSF 0.0%
$3.4B $18M $36.7B 7 explore

DARPA is a subset of the DoD-wide program and is shown for comparison, not counted separately. Retention is computed from each firm's full matched prime-contract totals — every matched dollar is in the denominator.

Where the follow-on dollars go

Each row is a seed program; each column is the department that awarded the follow-on prime contracts won by that program's SBIR firms. Sand-highlighted cells are dollars retained by the sponsor.

Seed programDoDHHSNASADHSDOENSFOtherCoverage
DARPA $23.5B $368M $3.6B $445M $13M $9M $3.1B 48.0%
DoD $81.6B $5.5B $6.7B $3.0B $566M $21M $14.0B 53.2%
HHS $22.2B $11.7B $11.0B $491M $188M $3M $4.8B 45.1%
NASA $23.7B $866M $4.2B $942M $77M $12M $4.8B 45.8%
DHS $6.8B $66M $94M $464M $19M $953M 49.3%
DOE $12.6B $293M $914M $413M $231M $7M $1.6B 48.6%
NSF $15.3B $762M $957M $553M $213M $16M $1.7B 53.0%

Disclosure: this matrix is approximated from each firm's largest follow-on contracts (top six per firm; firms average roughly 23). The coverage column reports the share of each program's total matched follow-on dollars those top contracts capture — roughly 45–54% — so cells understate absolute dollars but preserve the direction of flow. The retention ranking above is not affected: it uses each firm's full matched totals, not this top-six approximation.

Open the interactive Crucible pipeline →  ·  Methodology

Version 2026.2, generated 2026-08-27. SBIR.gov source vintage 2026-08-01.